“AI doesn’t want, it doesn’t have goals, it doesn’t want to kill you, because it’s not alive”

Substack – Jun 6, 2023

“My estimate [of AI risk without strong regulation] is: 'considerably less than most other potential causes of human extinction' Because we have agency in this.”

X – Oct 31, 2023

“I just think that the existential-risk stuff has been a completely bonkers distraction. There’s like 101 more practical issues that we should all be talking about, from privacy to bias to facial recognition to online moderation.”

Technology Review – Jul 13, 2023

“Probably [the risk of extinction] may exist, but I think the likelihood is quite small. I think the AI risks are more that people will be discriminated [against], they will not be seen as who they are”

The Guardian – Jun 13, 2023

“Mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority alongside other societal-scale risks such as pandemics and nuclear war.”

Center for AI Safety – May 30, 2023

“[Median respondent of 1,321 AI researchers gave a 5% chance of] 'Extremely bad (e.g. human extinction)' [in regard to AI]”

AI Impacts – Jan 4, 2024

“In terms of all of the concerns around the more existential risks, I don't think that anything at the level of what we or others in the field are working on in the next year is really in the ballpark of those types of risks”

Business Insider – Apr 18, 2024

“[AI] will improve healthcare, boost productivity, address climate change. But we also should not underestimate the very real threats. Hundreds of leading AI developers, academics and experts warned recently in the following words [reads CAIS AI Safety statement]”

European Parlaiment – Sep 12, 2023

“My concern with AI is actually existential, and existential risk is defined as many, many, many, many people harmed or killed”

Business Insider – Mar 25, 2023

“There is some chance, above zero, that AI will kill us all.”

Washington Post – Nov 1, 2023

“It can be very harmful if depolyed wrongly and we don't have all the answers there yet and the technology is moving fast. So does that keep me up at night? Absolutely”

60 Minutes – May 17, 2024

“So there's what I call the existential threat which is about whether [AI] will wipe out humanity. That's definitely a threat to humanity's existence.”

CNN – May 29, 2023

“I think maybe there's something like a 10-20% chance of AI takeover, [with] many [or] most humans dead”

Bankless Podcast – Apr 22, 2023

“Ah, I have to stay an optimist on this one. So I’m going to hedge on the side of lower risk there ... Maybe, like, 15%.”

Hard Fork – Nov 10, 2023

“Even if we manage to significantly reduce the probability of a rogue AI emerging, the tiniest probability of a major catastrophe—such as a nuclear war, the launch of highly potent bioweapons, or human extinction—is still unacceptable.”

Journal of Democracy – Sep 14, 2023

“As AI models become more capable, we believe that they will create major economic and social value, but will also present increasingly severe risks. ... [This document] focuses on catastrophic risks – those where an AI model directly causes large scale devastation.”

Responsible Scaling Policy – Sep 18, 2023

“My chance that something goes really quite catastrophically wrong on the scale of human civilisation might be somewhere between 10 per cent and 25 per cent.”

Logan Bartlett Show – Oct 5, 2023

“When it comes to very powerful technologies—and obviously AI is going to be one of the most powerful ever—we need to be careful”

Time – Jan 12, 2023

“Will there be a positive transition to a world with radically smarter-than-human artificial intelligence? [Median forecaster response 47%]”

Metaculus – May 14, 2024

“[In response to a range of 10%-90%] That’s probably the range I would give too.”

80,000 Hours – Aug 6, 2023

“Bigger than 5% and lower than 95%”

Closer to Truth – Apr 3, 2024

“If we actually try to [build Artificial General Intelligence] in real life, we are all going to die”

TED – Jul 10, 2023

“This is not going to put a lot of people out of work permanently”

BBC – Jun 14, 2023

“AI, if allowed to develop and proliferate throughout the economy, may cause the most dramatic and sustained economic boom of all time, with correspondingly record job and wage growth”

a16z – Jun 5, 2023

“We should look at AI much more as a co-pilot than something which is necessary going to replace someone's job. AI is a tool that can help almost anybody do their jobs better, faster, quicker.”

BBC News – Nov 2, 2023

“I think there will be new job creation, new skills picked up, and yes, there will be overall displacement in the labour market, which I think will be much more dynamic than we give labour markets credit for”

CNBC – Jan 24, 2024

“worker displacement from automation has historically been offset by creation of new jobs, and the emergence of new occupations following technological innovations accounts for the vast majority of long-run employment growth”

Dice – May 17, 2023

“A first analysis on Automation risk in the EU labour market, which uses data on skill needs and tasks of jobs from Cedefop’s 1st European skills and jobs survey, shows that about 14% of EU jobs face a risk of displacement by computer algorithms.”

Cedefop – May 18, 2024

“If you eventually get a society where you only have to work three days a week, that's probably OK”

Business Insider – Nov 22, 2023

“we expect these systems will be able to do all of some of today's jobs and aren't trying to hide the ball on that. confident [sic] we will find new and much better jobs when that happens”

X – Sep 29, 2023

“The jobs that are going to survive AI for a long time are jobs where you have to be very adaptable and physically skilled, and plumbing’s that kind of a job because manual dexterity is hard for a machine to replicate”

Collision 2023 – Jun 29, 2023

“Over the long term, I'm actually quite bullish that all these tools will give more people the potential to kind of do what they care about”

Morning Brew Daily – Feb 16, 2024

“If human-level artificial intelligence is developed, will World GDP grow by at least 30.0% in any of the subsequent 15 years? [Median forecaster response 56%]”

Metaculus – May 14, 2024

“AI is changing America’s jobs and workplaces, offering both the promise of improved productivity but also the dangers of increased workplace surveillance, bias, and job displacement.”

Executive Order – Oct 30, 2023

“In the long term...we have to think very hard about how we integrate these tools, because left completely to the market and to their own devices, these are fundamentally labor replacing tools”

Fortune – Jan 17, 2024

“Given the picture as we see it now, it’s conceivable that within the next ten years, AI systems will exceed expert skill level in most domains, and carry out as much productive activity as one of today’s largest corporations”

OpenAI – May 21, 2023

“it'll be basically text to action. You'll have an idea, and you'll say I want a 'this' and the system will show you the recipe or organize the events ... The systems will be smart enough to be able to communicate, send emails, make phone calls and so forth.”

Morningstar – Feb 23, 2024

“And then I think a lot of jobs that are maybe somewhat undervalued today — manual jobs, manual labor jobs ... or caring jobs ... I think, are going to be much more valued in future.”

NYT – Feb 23, 2024

“first [AI systems] speed up the productivity of humans, then they equal the productivity of humans, and then in some meaningful sense are the main contributor to scientific progress that happens at some point.”

Dwarkesh Podcast – Aug 7, 2023

“I think if you have a thing which works that’s incredibly labor intensive, I’m fairly optimistic about our ability to automate it.”

Dwarkesh Podcast – Oct 31, 2023

“conditional on [AGI] ... all work [will be automated] with the exception of work where there is a specific demand that it be performed by human [sic] or where the consumer cares about the process... [though there are] an avalanche of considerations ... for each of these ... questions.”

Closer To Truth Chats – Apr 3, 2024

“[2488 journal authors AI were asked split into 2 groups and asked about AI capabilities] The aggregate 2023 forecast predicted a 50% chance of [Human Level Machine Intelligence] by 2047 ... The aggregate 2023 forecast predicted a 50% chance of [Full Automation Of Labour] by 2116”

AI Impacts – Jan 4, 2024

“Well I think we are seeing the most disruptive force in history here. ... there will come a point where no job is needed. You can have a job for personal satisfaction, but the AI will be able to do everything.”

Rishi Sunak and Elon Musk interview – Nov 3, 2023

“AGI will not be upper-bounded by human ability or human learning speed.”

LessWrong – Jun 4, 2022

“the problem is that demon summoning is easy and angel summoning is much harder. Open sourcing all the demon summoning circles is not the correct solution.”

Bankless Podcast – Feb 20, 2023

“I think the things we’re building could be very dangerous at some point, and I think that point can come a lot more quickly than anyone is expecting. I think when that point comes, some of the open source stuff we have could be used by bad actors in conjunction with later insights to create very powerful AI systems in ways we aren’t thinking of right now, but we won’t be able to take back later.”

80,000 Hours – Jul 30, 2023

“Open source is great for scientific progress," Bengio said. "But if nuclear bombs were software, would you allow open-source nuclear bombs?”

bankinfo security – Jul 25, 2023

“it’s going to be completely obvious to everyone that open-sourcing AI is just not wise”

The Verge – Mar 15, 2023

“As soon as you open source everything people will start doing all sorts of crazy things with it. It would be a very quick way to discover how [AI] can go wrong”

Techmonitor – May 27, 2023

“When the weights for a dual-use foundation model are widely available — such as when they are publicly posted on the Internet — there can be substantial benefits to innovation, but also substantial security risks, such as the removal of safeguards within the model”

US Senate Testimony – Jul 24, 2023

“[Altman] said OpenAI also plans to open-source some additional large-language models developed by his company, though it has yet to decide which ones”

Fortune – Feb 13, 2024

“When the weights for a dual-use foundation model are widely available ... there can be substantial benefits to innovation, but also substantial security risks, such as the removal of safeguards within the model”

Executive Order – Oct 22, 2023

“The providers of general purpose AI models that are released under a free and open source license ... should be subject to exceptions as regards the transparency-related requirements ... unless they can be considered to present a systemic risk”

Data Innovation – Mar 4, 2024

“We have a long history of supporting responsible open source & science, which can drive rapid research progress, so we’re proud to release Gemma: a set of lightweight open models”

X – Feb 21, 2024

“OpenAI was created as an open source (which is why I named it “Open” AI), non-profit company to serve as a counterweight to Google”

Twitter – Feb 17, 2023

“Our long-term vision is to build general intelligence, open source it responsibly, and make it widely available so everyone can benefit.”

Indian Express – Jan 21, 2024

“the future has to be open source, if nothing else, for reasons of cultural diversity, democracy, diversity”

Time – Feb 13, 2024

“We believe an open approach is the right one for the development of today’s AI models, especially those in the generative space where the technology is rapidly advancing.”

Facebook – Jul 17, 2023

“We @a16z are 100% pro open source AI”

Twitter – Oct 2, 2023

“The moratorium on new large training runs needs to be indefinite and worldwide.”

Time – Mar 28, 2023

“My basic view is there's a really plausible world where it's sort of problematic to try and build a bunch of AI systems and use them as tools. And the thing I really want to do in that world is just not try and build a ton of AI systems to make money from them.”

Dwarkesh Podcast – Oct 31, 2023

“I’m all in favor of accelerating technological progress, but there is something unsettling about the way OpenAI explicitly declares its mission to be the creation of AGI.”

Twitter – Nov 22, 2023

“If we’re in a “near-pessimistic” scenario, this could instead involve channeling our collective efforts towards AI safety research and halting AI progress in the meantime.”

Anthropic – Mar 8, 2023

“But I think there’s a lot of uncertainty about what superintelligence means and where it could go. And I think you can raise a lot of these concerns without needing to have a settled view there.”

80,000 Hours – Jul 30, 2023

“We’ve come to this view that, in order to build the products that we want to build, we need to build for general intelligence”

The Verge – Jan 18, 2024

“The vision is to make AGI, figure out how to make it safe ... and figure out the benefits.”

The Financial Times – Feb 13, 2023

“We want America to maintain our scientific and technological edge, because it’s critical to us thriving in the 21st century economy”

US State Department – Jul 12, 2021

“Philanthropy is my full-time job these days, and I’ve been thinking a lot about how—in addition to helping people be more productive—AI can reduce some of the world’s worst inequities.”

Gates Notes – Mar 21, 2023

“We believe the right way to respond to this moment in AI is with cautious optimism—with a firm grasp of the incredible benefits that AI could create, but also a sober understanding of the near and long-term challenges that we need to prepare for.”

The Atlantic – May 18, 2024

“(0) there will be superhuman AI in the future (1) they will be under our control (2) they will not dominate us nor kill us (3) they will mediate all of our interactions with the digital world (4) hence, they will need to be open platforms so that everyone can contribute to training and tuning them.”

X – Nov 25, 2024

“it would be tragic if we never developed advanced artificial intelligence. I think all the paths to really great futures ultimately lead through the development of machine super-intelligence”

UnHerd – Nov 12, 2023

“We believe any deceleration of AI will cost lives. Deaths that were preventable by the AI that was prevented from existing is a form of murder”

A16Z – Oct 16, 2023

“There should be no regulatory barriers to open source [AI] whatsoever.”

a16z – Jun 5, 2023

“asking for regulations because of fear of superhuman intelligence is like asking for regulation of transatlantic flights at near the speed of sound in 1925.”

El Pais – Jan 19, 2024

“We believe the right approach here is to take inspiration from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)”

Financial Times – Oct 18, 2023

“We talk about the IAEA as a model where the world has said 'OK, very dangerous technology, let's all put some guard rails.' And I think we can do both”

euronews – Jun 7, 2023

“We believe the right approach here is to take inspiration from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change”

The Financial Times – Oct 18, 2023

“I think we have to start with something like the IPCC, where it’s a scientific and research agreement with reports, and then build up from there.”

Guardian – Oct 24, 2023

“The world needs an international agency for artificial intelligence”

The Economist – Apr 17, 2023

“Governments should fund and participate in the development of rigorous capability and safety evaluations targeted at critical risks from advanced AI,such as deception and autonomy.”

Anthropic – Jun 5, 2023

“There is a real danger for digital superintelligence having negative consequences ... I am in favour of AI regulation”

“I think even in a world where you have very powerful safe AI systems, you probably still need some kind of regulatory framework for how to use those to use force to stop other systems.”

80,000 Hours – Jul 22, 2023

“I think [a global regulatory approach to AI is] very desirable, because I think we’re now at this point where these are global challenges that require global norms and global standards”

CNBC – Jan 16, 2024

“Regardless of whether risk mitigation takes the form of responsible scaling policies or something else, I think voluntary action by companies isn’t enough. If the risk is large then the most realistic approach is regulation and eventually international coordination.”

Alignment Forum – Oct 23, 2023

“The State Department, in collaboration, with the Commerce Department will lead an effort to establish robust international frameworks for harnessing AI’s benefits and managing its risks and ensuring safety.”

Executive Order – Oct 30, 2023

“It's international action or bust; you have to stop ASI everywhere.”

Twitter – Dec 20, 2023

“In April 2021, the Commission proposed the EU AI Act and a new Coordinated Plan with Member States, to guarantee the safety and fundamental rights of people and businesses, while strengthening investment and innovation across EU countries.”

European Commission – Jan 24, 2024

“When you hear one-liners like "what if AI released a virus" your bullshit meter should be screaming.”

X – Feb 25, 2024

“Create a bioweapon? That’s a crime. Commit a terrorist act? That’s a crime. We can simply focus on preventing those crimes when we can, and prosecuting them when we cannot. We don’t even need new laws”

a16z – Jun 5, 2023

“The current generation of large language models (LLMs) ... do not increase the risk of a biological weapons attack by a non-state actor”

Rand Corporation – Oct 24, 2024

“The darkest scenario is that people will experiment with pathogens, engineered synthetic pathogens that might end up accidentally or intentionally being more transmissible or more lethal”

Diary Of A CEO Podcast – Sep 3, 2023

“AI systems may become much better at science and engineering, to the point where they could be misused to cause large-scale destruction, particularly in the domain of biology”

US Senate Hearing – Jul 24, 2023

“It’s going to be possible for bad actors to take the large databases of how biology works and use it to generate things which hurt human beings”

Air and Space Forces Magazine – Sep 11, 2022

“international approaches have so far identified the need to pay attention to risks from potential intentional misuse or unintended issues of control relating to alignment with human intent; chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear risks”

European Parlaiment – Apr 18, 2024

“Get this wrong and it could make it easier to build chemical or biological weapons.”

Rishi Sunak warns AI could be used by terrorists to build chemical and biological weapons – Oct 25, 2023

“One potentially harmful use, highlighted by researchers and policymakers, is the ability for AI systems to assist malicious actors in creating biological threats”

https://openai.com/index/building-an-early-warning-system-for-llm-aided-biological-threat-creation/ – Jan 31, 2024

“Hassabis, the British chief executive of Google’s AI unit, said the world must act immediately in tackling the technology’s dangers, which included aiding the creation of bioweapons”

Guardian – Oct 23, 2023

“[1,345 AI researchers answered the following questions around concern] AI lets dangerous groups make powerful tools (eg engineered viruses). [About 75% said they had "substantial concern" or "extreme concern" with the other 25% saying "a little concern" or "no concern]”

AI Impacts – Jan 4, 2024

“The term “dual-use foundation model” means an AI model ... that exhibits ... high levels of performance at tasks that pose a serious risk to security ... such as by ... substantially lowering the barrier of entry for non-experts to design, synthesize, acquire, or use chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear (CBRN) weapons”

Executive Order – Oct 30, 2023

“Losing a conflict with a high-powered cognitive system looks at least as deadly as 'everybody on the face of the Earth suddenly falls over dead within the same second'”

LessWrong – Jun 4, 2022

“Remember 4 years ago how LLMs & Deep Fakes were going to destroy society? They are now widely available, both as a service and as open source software. The doomsday scenarios have not happened.”

Twitter – Nov 19, 2022

“What you have to do instead is basically have a system in which real people can certify that content about them is real”

YouTube – Apr 1, 2024

“The law needs to be clear about which uses of deepfakes are legal and about how deepfakes should be labeled so everyone understands when something they’re seeing or hearing is not genuine”

Gates Notes – Jul 10, 2023

“Legislating AI-driven electioneering would be one concrete step towards ameliorating the spiraling political consequences of the coming wave. And it shouldn’t be the last.”

Fortune – Sep 4, 2023

“I think all governments should insist that all fake images be flagged.”

El Pais – May 12, 2023

“I think if [deepfakes are] not regulated, we are in for a huge amount of pain.”

Vox – Sep 20, 2023

“Ban AI voice impersonations and more”

US State Of The Union – Mar 8, 2024

“I think we need another breakthrough [...] I don't think [scaling] will do something that I view as critical to a general intelligence”

the decoder – Nov 17, 2023

“I am still a skeptic who thinks that large language models are shallow, and not close to AGI. But they can still do real damage”

Twitter – Mar 29, 2023

“We’ve got to carry on improving the large models ... That’s clearly a necessary, but probably insufficient component of an AGI system.”

Dwarkesh Podcast – Feb 28, 2024

“I'm in agreement with Demis Hassabis, who recently gave a talk where he said he thinks we still need one or two major breakthroughs before we have the kinds of capabilities that would be a big flashing red light for the human race.”

Berkeley News – Apr 8, 2024

“I think those long years of scaling experience have taught me to be very skeptical, but also skeptical of the claim that an LLM can’t do anything”

TechCrunch – Sep 21, 2023

“I don't think that there is only one path to AGI. The LLM path might be not the most efficient one, but it will get the job done.”

Dwarkesh Patel – Mar 27, 2023

“'Regulation' of AI (math) is the foundation of a new totalitarianism.”

Twitter – Dec 16, 2023

“Regulating research and development in AI is incredibly counterproductive”

Financial Times – Oct 18, 2023

“Getting this right will take a collective effort from governments, industry and civil society to inform and develop robust safety tests and evaluations”

UK Government – Nov 2, 2023

“While AI promises significant societal benefits, it also poses a range of potential harms. Critical to managing these risks is government capacity to measure and monitor the capability and safety characteristics of AI models”

UK Government – Nov 2, 2023

“Compute usage is relatively straightforward to define, measure, and verify, making it an attractive way to target regulation”

CSET – Oct 6, 2023

“The U.S. government should consider a combination of licensing or registration requirements for development and release of AI models above a crucial threshold of capabilities”

Testimony Before The US Senate Committee – Apr 1, 2023

“A model shall be considered to have potential capabilities that could be used in malicious cyber-enabled activity if it requires a quantity of computing power greater than 10^26 integer or floating-point operations”

The White House – Oct 30, 2023

“The initial FLOPs threshold for this has been set as 10^25”

EU – Jan 26, 2024

“These objective-driven architectures will be safe and will remain under our control because *we* set their objectives and guardrails and they can't deviate from them”

Twitter – Oct 28, 2023

“The idea that it will at some point develop a mind of its own and decide that it has motivations that lead it to try to kill us is a superstitious handwave”

A16Z – Jun 6, 2023

“Solving AI problems is exponentially hard, but checking the solutions is easy. Therefore powerful AI does not imply loss of control by us humans.”

Forbes – Apr 12, 2023

“We found that, despite our best efforts at alignment training, deception still slipped through.”

Twitter – Jan 12, 2024

“The idea is that, in order to show that the systems will not cross those red lines, the companies will have to be able to understand, predict and control the AI systems that they build, and at the moment they are not close to being able to do that.”

Berkeley News – Apr 8, 2024

“I argued in the book that this is a non-trivial problem, and in fact there are proposals on how to solve this control problem that look plausible at first sight but upon closer examination, turn out not to work”

Forbes – Jun 26, 2016

“When I say that alignment is difficult, I mean that in practice, using the techniques we actually have, "please don't disassemble literally everyone with probability roughly 1" is an overly large ask that we are not on course to get.”

LessWrong – Mar 5, 2024